Pehlu Khan Verdict shows the despicable state of Justice in New India


“Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere”— this incisive remark by Martin Luther King Jr sprang to my mind as an Alwar court acquitted all the six men accused of beating Pehlu Khan to death. The dead obviously can’t cry for justice, and so it becomes our duty, of the living, to ensure there is no travesty of justice.

Despite video evidence of the horrific mob lynching that shook the nation in April 2017, the court gave the benefit of doubt to the accused, arguing that the probe by the Rajasthan Police was riddled with ‘serious shortcomings’ and ‘gross negligence’. Beyond the brutal violence that killed Pehlu in the name of the Holy Cow, beyond the disturbing mindset of the Gau Rakshaks, and the blatant violation of human rights, is the utter collapse of the police and the criminal justice system, that this case signifies.

The verdict raises serious questions about our entire system, as Pehlu’s fate in many ways reflects India’s relentless march towards normalising violence and bigotry. In giving the accused the benefit of doubt, the court lists serious “contradictions” in the police probe and in the prosecution’s evidence.

Firstly, no forensics was done on the video of the incident which went viral and was seen by millions. Inevitably, the court ruled that the video footage of the mob lynching could not be treated as admissible evidence, in the absence of its certification by a forensic laboratory. As the verdict says : “The video, on the basis of which the accused were charged in this case, the mobile through which this video was shot, and not finding and confiscating it, signifies gross negligence of the investigating officer.”

In fact, the six men Pehlu Khan named as his attackers before he died, were all absolved of any guilt by the police in 2017 itself. This, despite Indian law regarding a “dying declaration” as evidence so strong, that an accused individual can be convicted solely on its basis. (The premise upheld in countless court rulings is that a “dying man can never lie”.)

The court also points out that in a case when instead of the named accused, other people were made accused by the police, the accused ought to be identified—but shockingly in the police investigation, the identification of the accused was never done.

As the verdict observes: “In this way, during the investigation, serious shortcomings were left, which brings the prosecution’s case in the ambit of suspicion and the accused stand to benefit from that suspicion.”

All this virtually smacks of a shocking botch up by the police under the Raje-BJP government that then ruled Rajasthan with RSS heavyweight Gulab Chand Kataria as its Home Minister. Many believe the police discarded Pehlu’s dying declaration, in order to protect influential cow vigilantes affiliated to Sangh organisations.

It is claimed that the doctor of the private hospital did not want to get entangled in a criminal case. But this is precisely where the Police’s role comes into play – to make sure the legal process is followed.

Four others, who were beaten alongside Pehlu, have also complained that names from their statements were deliberately omitted by the police. Aarif Khan, Pehlu’s son, has often underlined the death threats his family received in case they spoke up — but they got no protection, and have repeatedly claimed that the police is helping the accused.

All this ensured a weak prosecution case based on a shoddy investigation under the Raje government. As Qasim Khan, the counsel for Pehlu Khan’s sons remarks bluntly : “We suspect the police left several loopholes in their probe under pressure from the previous BJP government in Rajasthan.”


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here